matthew. gallion.

For Abigail

Her teeny tiny giggle gurgles from the backseat
and she wheezes from the laughing. 

The noise bursts from her like an innocent hurricane,
                         devastating me,
                                                   flattening me. 

No amount of preparation or guardedness can save me. 

She is god and daughter to me—
the object of my devotion and my precious child. 

She is innocent, even a bit naïve,
completely oblivious to the pain and terror the world waits to pile on her. 
Her simplicity reminds me of the freedom to ignore the world, to willfully close my eyes and wistfully remember to breathe,

to live. 

She saves my soul with every choked out, snotty, shrill squeal of delight.  


Sovereignty, if it can still be called sovereign, will be seen as the ‘power not to,’ the ability to resist exercising positive power.

— Clayton Crockett, Radical Political Theology: Religion and Politics after Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011), 45.


Yet, we still haven’t reached a cultural tipping point; a large sector of the American public is still faithful to a system that has brought home so much bacon. These people view an unfettered free market with something like religious fervor.

— David Wann, The New Normal: An Agenda for Responsible Living (New York: St. Martin’s Griffin, 2010), 42.


‘Or he would say, “Teach the ignorant as much as you can; society is guilty of not providing universal free education, and it must answer for the night it produces. If the soul is left in darkness, sins will be committed. The guilty one is not he who commits the sin, but the one who causes the darkness.”

Clearly, he had his own strange way of judging things. I suspect he acquired it from the Gospels.

— Victor Hugo, Les Misérables


Harry Potter and the Better Ending

*SPOILER ALERT*

So, I, like most Harry Potter fanatics, saw the new movie at a midnight show. After seeing on the big screen I gotta say, I was a little disappointed. First off, I thought the movie itself was a bit lazy. I felt the key elements of the story were neglected for some ridiculous CGI battle scenes. (Why did Harry’s and Voldemort’s heads get squished together, for example?) Where did the Hallows go? Where was the over-powering message of love? These elements were present, I’ll be the first to admit, but they seemed rushed to me.

Second, I realized I wasn’t a huge fan of the ending anyway. It was too neat, too convenient. ‘But it was a film adaptation of a book written for kids,’ you’ll say. ‘Pssh,’ I say. So here’s how it should have ended:

After Harry comes to terms with the necessity of his own death, he should have marched right on down there to ol’ Voldemort and let himself be killed. So far, the movie did alright. Then, however, there was this whole bit about Harry coming back from the dead (apparently because he was protected by love, which was seriously underplayed in the film). That’s the part they should have left out. Harry should have just died. He should have given his life to weaken Voldemort. The resurrection and subsequent happy life that Harry enjoys immediately thereafter seemed too neat and convenient to me. Not only that but it seemed to implement some sort of economy of exchange, suggesting that giving your life to fight evil will result in some sort of ultimate reward. I also couldn’t help but wonder what it was that actually separated Harry Potter from Tom Riddle to begin with? If it was love and Harry’s mother died to protect him, isn’t Voldemort’s greatest crime something like being an orphan or having lousy parents?

But I digress. Harry should have faced his death and died a hero. Voldemort should have carried Harry’s lifeless body back to Hogwarts where Neville would deliver a fantastic speech about Harry’s legacy. In essence, Neville would argue that Harry’s life was unimportant. His legacy of fighting evil could not be stopped even by death. If Harry was gone, then others would take his place. Neville would raise the sword of Gryffindor over his head and lead a new charge. As the two sides collide, the credits would roll.

This would obviously be a much less satisfying resolution to the story for many people, but Rowling herself demonstrated just how devastating resolution can be. The epilogue, in both its written and cinematic expressions, was terrible. It proves without a doubt that stories that are too clearly resolved ruin our hopes for the unpredictability of life. Do we actually want to know that everything is okay? Or is there not something beautiful about the uncertainty of the future? Sure, Harry could have survived and lived to fight Voldemort on his own. He could have (and did) come back from the dead and take it all on himself. He could be the Christ-figure who comes to save the world. But isn’t the beauty of this story that people die fighting with Harry? That people are inspired by Harry’s decisions to take responsibility for themselves? 

We need more uncertain endings. We need less heroes. We need the Boy-Who-Lived to be the Boy-Who-Died. Then maybe we can start living ourselves.


UPDATE!

I suppose I should tell you what I’m doing with my life. Well, right now, I’m sitting in line to see Harry Potter, shooting some craps. What a night.


Coming alive (Or, Why are you so dark?)

Life can be so entirely draining. There are an endless number of experiences that leave me feeling exhausted, overwhelmed, or inferior. During these seasons, I often feel as if I can’t sleep or read or write. Ultimately, this lack of ‘productivity’ only intensifies my lethargy and depression. So, I’m going to write more, even if I say less.

As I’ve struggled to come to terms with the destruction in my life, I’ve found a great deal of healing and hope, though it has had an unforeseen consequence: I’ve been quite comfortable with the power of trauma for my own existential being. That isn’t to say that I don’t have regrets, but it is to say that I have learned a great deal about myself and about what I perceive is just and right through my experiences. As a result, I’ve found a certain comfort in tragedies and somber stories. I suppose that, in certain ways, I may come across as incredibly dark and cynical, but I find it all incredibly affirmative and hopeful.

For those of you who don’t know, I’m going through a divorce. It’s brutal and gut-wrenching and terrible all at the same time. It’s no surprise that it’s an awful experience; these things always are. But it’s also been a process, both before I was aware of the difficulties in my life and after. I’ve been regularly seeing a counselor and relying heavily on a wonderful support system of friends and family. I appreciate all of the kind words that I’ve heard, and I suppose part of my reason for writing is to let everyone know that I am surviving—quite well actually.

Again, while these things are always tragedies, I’m not enough of a literalist to believe that divorce isn’t for the best sometimes. I suppose I could wax philosophically and hermeneutically to defend myself, to make my case, and to justify my actions. But those moves would undermine what I believe most about this situation (and about Christianity as a whole): life often comes from death. Resurrection is a real thing—even if it was not a singular, historical event.

So to all of those who are concerned for me, thank you for your constant care. To those who have encouraged me, thank you for your endless support.

And to J. J. Abrams, thanks for Super 8.

“Bad things happen, but you can live.”


What we thus have here is a universal truth insofar as love is infinite and beyond the power of logic to guarantee the process of inference and connection. Here loves calls us to abandon all structures that return glory back upon anything at all. What then is love but nothing short of forgoing the ethical doctrine of consequentialism (among other things), which states that one must always measure the consequences of an action and make a decision based on the preferred outcome among rivaling possibilities? Love for Paul then is the infinite in-breaking as the world’s very appearance of such and reveals that no ‘security structures’ (from the military to the police to the banks and their auditors and even to insurance companies) are ultimately effective in preventing the truth of subversion from taking hold in the world—that truth is the truth of Incarnation, the ultimate subversive act.

— Creston Davis, “Paul and Subtraction” in Paul’s New Moment: Continental Philosophy and the Future of Christian Theology, ed. by Creston Davis, John Milbank, and Slavoj Žižek (Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2010). 


 - Part of Tumblr [Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]
381,130 plays

Part of Tumblr

world-shaker:

10knotes:

reyvan:

Part of Tumblr

Look at this site, isn’t it neat? Wouldn’t you think that this dashboard’s complete?
Wouldn’t you think I’m the girl. The girl who blogs… everything?
Look at this trove, treasures untold. How many wonders can one Tumblr hold?
Looking around here you think. Sure, reblog everything. I’ve seen memes and hipsters aplenty.
Reblogged graphics and text posts galore. You want messages? I’ve got twenty!
But who cares, no big deal. I want more…
I want to be where the hipsters are.
I want to see, want to see them bloggin’.
Putting some pics in their; What do you call it? Oh queue.
Facebook and MySpace won’t get you far.
Friends are required for liking, commenting.
When they start creeping then you just… what’s that word again? Block.
Up where they like, where they reblog. Where they have Caturday and Sundog.
Signup is free. Wish I could be. Part of Tumblr.
What would I give if I could live without these errors?
What would I pay to spend the day scrolling my dash?
Bet David Karp, he has a heart.
Bet he won’t reprimend his followers.
Bright young hipsters, don’t need misters.
Forever alone.
I’m ready to know what those hipsters know!
Ask them my questions and get some answers!
What is breathing? And what is… what’s the word? Air?
When’s it my turn. Wouldn’t I love.
Love to like, follow and reblog.
Out of Facebook. Wish I could be.
Part of Tumblr.

Awesome song…count the mispronounced words though.  Meme (supposed to be pronounced like “cream”, she actually says it like ‘may-may’), queue (supposed to sound like the letter ‘Q’, she pronounces it like ‘quay’), and did she even mispronounce Facebook at the end (didn’t catch it very well, but pretty sure she did)?

Featured on 10Knotes, the 10,000 notes blog.

This. Is. Great.

(Source: tavris-sprite)